Secret Sharing & Threshold Cryptography
| Status | Statement | Tags |
|---|---|---|
|
AVPs Are Lengthy Posed as Hypothesis 1.2 and offered both as a working hypothesis and as an ambitious target. Theorem 1.3 proves it implies super-polynomial lower bounds on sd-PIR, general secret sharing and fully-decomposable randomized encodings – for none of which a super-linear lower bound is currently known. The source adapts counting-based arguments to the model but does not reach the best-known bound for any primitive. 4 open |
Garbled CircuitsPrivate Information RetrievalProof Size Lower BoundsRandomized Encodingslower-boundbarrier (ai) | |
|
Sub-log Share Size for 2-out-of-n The information-theoretic share size is exactly log n and Shamir’s scheme matches it. The source proves a (1/5) log log n lower bound for the computational setting with public information, leaving a log n versus log log n gap, and proves that beating log n by any constant factor is equivalent to a concrete planted clique-and-independent-set problem. 4 open |
Average Case HardnessPlanted Subgraph ProblemsThreshold Secret Sharingtight-bound | |
|
Conflict Checkable Codes Beyond Half-Singleton Theorem 1.8 proves k <= (n-d+2)/2 for codes that are both comparison-based and local-to-global consistent. Theorem 1.3 gives an almost-MDS conflict checkable code at k >= n-d+1-epsilon which bypasses that bound, but it is neither comparison-based nor known to be local-to-global consistent. The conjecture names comparison-basedness as the culprit. It already holds at d = n-1. 4 open |
Code Based CryptographyLocally Testable CodesThreshold Secret Sharingseparationadaptation (ai) | |
|
Threshold one-shot decryption without extractability Open: whether threshold one-shot decryption (for every corruption threshold f < 1/2) follows from one-shot signatures and an ordinary, non-extractable witness encryption scheme. The one known construction needs the witness-encryption extractor to run its security reduction, and the source paper leaves open whether extractability can be weakened or dropped altogether. 4 open |
One Shot SignaturesWitness EncryptionassumptionIOG | |
|
Perfect FASS at 3-out-of-5 Statistical and computational FASS are settled by the source and prior work. The perfect version is stated by the source to be open for every reconstruction threshold 3 <= t <= n-2, and open even for the weaker multi-dealer notion, with 3-out-of-5 the smallest open case. Con has settled the perfect case for gap threshold structures. 5 open |
AnonymityThreshold Secret Sharingcharacterizationadaptation (ai) | |
|
WP Threshold Share Size The 2-out-of-n case is settled: Beimel and Franklin give 1/n-weakly-private schemes with share size 2, against Theta(log n) for perfect privacy. The source states large thresholds are open and asks specifically about (n-1)-out-of-n at share size o(log n). 5 open |
Threshold Secret Sharingcharacterizationadaptation (ai) |
No matching items