Falsifiable

Status Statement Tags
CPA PKE, Quantumly Broken
The first item in the source’s Open Problems section. It builds counterexamples for PRFs, CPA-secure symmetric-key encryption, MACs, signatures and CCA-2-secure public-key encryption, all classically secure under LWE via black-box reductions and all quantumly broken with two or three classical queries. CPA-secure public-key encryption is the case its technique cannot reach, and it says why. 4 open
Black Box SeparationsLearning With ErrorsQuantum Cryptographyseparation
Two-scheme key cycle
Open in both directions, and the source paper says why the existing separations miss it: the counterexamples fix both schemes, whereas here the second is chosen after the first. Two hypotheses left implicit in the printed statement have to be added before it is even non-vacuous. 7 open
Circular SecurityFully Homomorphic Encryptionassumption
1+1 adaptively secure lattice threshold signature
Resolved. Oriole (Jiang, Wee, Zhu, ePrint 2026/793, posted April 2026, a month after Tweed) gives a lattice-based threshold signature with exactly this shape – two rounds, only the second message-dependent, adaptive security against T-1 corruptions with no erasures, from MSIS and MLWE in the ROM – verified here directly against the paper’s PDF (Definition of adp-TS-sUF-4 in its Figure 4, and the Theorem 2 + Theorem 3 reduction chain to MSIS), not just its abstract. The proof is human-written and published, but not yet independently re-verified line-by-line by this site, nor formalized in Lean.
Learning With ErrorsThreshold SignaturesTight Reductionsromseparationresearch-solved
Planted k-OV Hardness
Conjecture 10 of the source, and a newly proposed average-case assumption rather than a question the literature already asked. Its worst-case counterpart – that k-OV requires n^(k-o(1)) time – is a central conjecture of fine-grained complexity. The planting preserves the marginal distribution of any subset of fewer than k vectors, and the source gives a search-to-decision reduction. 5 open
Average Case HardnessFine Grained CryptographyOrthogonal VectorsPlanted Constraint Satisfactionassumption
Sub-log Share Size for 2-out-of-n
The information-theoretic share size is exactly log n and Shamir’s scheme matches it. The source proves a (1/5) log log n lower bound for the computational setting with public information, leaving a log n versus log log n gap, and proves that beating log n by any constant factor is equivalent to a concrete planted clique-and-independent-set problem. 4 open
Average Case HardnessPlanted Subgraph ProblemsThreshold Secret Sharingtight-bound
Sublinear-Time CGKA Refresh
The source achieves worst-case sublinear communication with forward secrecy, but its refresh algorithms still run in time polynomial in the group size, and it leaves open, without committing to a specific target rate, whether sublinear-time refresh is achievable at all. 4 open
Broadcast EncryptionContinuous Group Key Agreementcharacterization
Erasing real-or-random vs Boneh–Zhandry
Open: whether erasing real-or-random security implies Boneh-Zhandry security. The reverse non-implication is proved only in the quantum random oracle model, and this direction is one of six non-implications the source paper conjectures and does not prove. 5 open
Quantum CryptographyQuantum Encryption Notionsseparation
CRS-free everlasting commitment from malicious PUFs
Open: whether everlasting UC commitment is achievable in the fully malicious token model with no trusted setup. The source achieves it with a common reference string (its Theorem 31) and explicitly leaves removing the CRS as a question, noting that the usual equivocation techniques do not transfer to the everlasting setting. 6 open
Commitment SchemesPhysically Uncloneable Functionsotherassumption
Logarithmic independence implies PRP
Open at independence order log n. The same implication is refuted at order 4 and at every constant order by an explicit construction; the logarithmic-order form is untouched, and no unconditional proof of it can be expected. 5 open
Limited IndependencePseudorandom Permutationscharacterization
NISC Overhead from a PRG
The source poses this question and then answers the variant in which the pseudorandom generator is replaced by a random oracle, which leaves the question as posed unresolved. Each of the four relaxations – polylogarithmic overhead, correlated-abort security, extra rounds, or programmable OLE correlations – is already known. 4 open
Garbled CircuitsNon Interactive Secure Computationcharacterizationadaptation (ai)
No expanding weak quadratic PRGs
Open: whether every family of quadratic Λ(n)-bounded polynomials at stretch m ≥ n^{1+ε} admits an efficient distinguisher from the same evaluations plus bounded independent noise; the paper proves only the i.i.d.-nice special case (Theorem 2) and reports, without proof, that no degree-two candidate survives its attacks experimentally. 3 open
Average Case HardnessPseudorandom Generatorsimpossibility
One erasing challenge vs many embedding learns
Open: whether a single erasing two-ciphertext challenge query, with classical learning queries, implies security against polynomially many embedding-model superposition learning queries. One of six non-implications the source paper conjectures, and on its own account the one that would close the most remaining cells. 5 open
Quantum CryptographyQuantum Encryption Notionsseparation
Standard real-or-random vs embedding two-ciphertext
Open: whether one standard-oracle real-or-random challenge query implies one embedding-model two-ciphertext challenge query, with classical learning queries on both sides. Both notions are singleton classes in the source’s classification, and this is one of six non-implications it conjectures. 5 open
Quantum CryptographyQuantum Encryption Notionsseparation
Threshold one-shot decryption without extractability
Open: whether threshold one-shot decryption (for every corruption threshold f < 1/2) follows from one-shot signatures and an ordinary, non-extractable witness encryption scheme. The one known construction needs the witness-encryption extractor to run its security reduction, and the source paper leaves open whether extractability can be weakened or dropped altogether. 4 open
One Shot SignaturesWitness EncryptionassumptionIOG
Blockwise-random quadratic recovery
Open: whether there is a polynomial-time algorithm that provably recovers the planted input from m = n^{1+eps} published quadratics of the blockwise-random (Lin-Matt) form, sum of a random sparse (perfect-matching) part and an independent random dense part. The paper proves this for i.i.d.-nice polynomial distributions (Theorem 2) but the blockwise-random distribution is not nice, and reports only experimental recovery via a modified semidefinite program. 5 open
Average Case HardnessPseudorandom Generatorsassumption
PKE from constant-noise planted k-XOR
Open: whether public-key encryption can be based on the hardness of planted k-XOR with a linear number of equations and a constant noise rate, as a single assumption. The survey poses it as one of two closing open questions and does not return to it; every combinatorial scheme it surveys needs sub-constant noise.
Average Case HardnessPlanted Constraint Satisfactionseparationbarrier (ai)
Certifying no small non-expanding set
Open: whether the non-existence of a small non-expanding set in a random unbalanced bipartite graph admits a nondeterministic certificate that is sound and complete on average, at the parameters the ABW cryptosystem uses. The survey poses it as one of two closing open questions, takes no position, and does not return to it.
Average Case HardnessExpander Graphsseparation
· Signed rank-one reweighting below the square root
Resolved, affirmatively and more strongly than asked: every Borel probability measure on the sphere admits a signed reweighting reaching an exact (not merely epsilon-close) nonzero rank-one second moment at entropy cost only O(log n) – below every n^delta, for every delta > 0, with the constant C(epsilon,delta) = 2/(e*delta) independent of epsilon. Proved by an AI-driven proof harness (conjecture-harness campaign c/0048) across six revision rounds, twenty independent blind adversarial referee passes over four audited rounds, and four independent triage rulings; the load-bearing chain (Lemmas 1-4, Theorem, Corollary, Corollary B) has never had an upheld finding against it. No human has reviewed the mathematics, and nothing here is formalized in Lean. A separate concurrent session forked the same campaign at round 3 and closed the same scope-commentary gap by a different (but mathematically equivalent) edit; both branches are recorded in the campaign ledger and the fork is not yet reconciled. 6 open
Log Rank ConjectureSum Of Squaresassumptionresearch-solved
SSS Implies Fiat-Shamir Friendly
Conjecture 1.3 of the source. It is explicit that it does not prove it – ‘only conjecture it’ – and asks for the proof or refutation as an important open problem. It does prove that SSS implies straight-line soundness, hence post-quantum soundness, and that its own instantiation of Kilian’s protocol is SSS. 4 open
Commitment SchemesFiat ShamirSnarkscharacterization
Best Separable State, constant completeness error
Open: whether the paper’s 2^{Otilde(sqrt n)}-time algorithm for Best Separable State extends from perfect (and near-perfect, 1-1/n) completeness to any constant completeness error c < 1. The paper conjectures the affirmative and lists this first among its open questions; no partial result at any intermediate error is reported. 5 open
Quantum InformationSum Of Squaresassumption
Binary dual-distance bound is the worst case
Open, and asserted rather than asked – the source writes that it expects the inequality, gives an intuition covering one of the two competing effects, records that all prior work assumes it, and proves nothing. A probe at small parameters is consistent with it; the parameters the source’s own construction uses are out of computational reach, which is why the source does not check it either. 7 open
Average Case HardnessDual DistanceLearning Parity With Noiselower-boundadaptation (ai)
Permuted Codes Conjecture
A new hardness assumption, printed as Conjecture 3.1 of the source and stated in its most general form deliberately, as a target for cryptanalysis rather than as the minimum its applications need. Implied by the older permuted puzzles conjecture; statistically true for O(log n) samples over constant-size alphabets; false if any one of its three randomizations is dropped. 4 open
Code Based CryptographyDual DistancePseudorandom CodesWatermarkingassumptionbarrier (ai)
Polynomial Compatibility Conjecture
Open in the inverse-polynomial regime. Proved for exponentially small influences by the paper that introduced it, and false for influences at or above 1/(2d); everything between is what the quantum separations depend on. 5 open
Compressed OracleQuantum Query ComplexityQuantum Random Oracle Modelqromassumption
Three moves from DL, ROM only
Open: three moves, black-box in the group, ROM only, from DL alone. Three moves is achieved from DDH in the ROM and from DL in AGM+ROM; four moves is achieved from DL in the ROM. 5 open
Blind SignaturesRandom Oracle ModelSignature SchemesTight Reductionsromassumption
Single-session lattice Chevallier-Mames tightness
Open: whether the one-session lattice translation of the Chevallier-Mames signature has a tight SUF-CMA reduction to search Module-LWE, or whether the paper’s two-fold parallel repetition (which doubles signature size and signing time) is inherent to a tight proof of this shape. 4 open
Learning With ErrorsSignature SchemesTight Reductionsromtight-bound
XOR as a Weak 2-Immunizer
The single unresolved cell in the source’s own table: XOR fails as a strong 2-immunizer under Alekhnovich, a bilinear pairing fails as a weak one under SXDH, a random oracle succeeds even with auxiliary input. The weak case for XOR is left open with a conjectured answer and a concrete route to it. 4 open
Backdoored PrimitivesBlack Box SeparationsPseudorandom Generatorsseparationadaptation (ai)
No matching items