Unconditional
| Status | Statement | Tags |
|---|---|---|
|
192-Round AES Pairwise Independence Theorem 7 proves the bound for 192-round censored AES – real AES S-boxes and mixing layer, but a subset of the mixing layers removed. The source conjectures the same round count suffices for AES itself, and calls proving it an outstanding open problem. The best proved bound for actual AES is Liu, Tessaro and Vaikuntanathan’s, which needs more than 9000 rounds. 4 open |
Block CiphersLimited IndependencePseudorandom PermutationsT Wise Independencetight-bound | |
|
Balanced Root-n Preprocessing PIR The client-space-times-bandwidth product is settled up to n^{o(1)} by the source’s own matching bounds. What is open is whether client space, bandwidth and per-query server computation can all sit at O~(n^{1/2}) simultaneously; the best known point has client space and server computation O~(n^{2/3}). 4 open |
Private Information RetrievalTime Space Tradeoffstight-bound | |
|
Planted-Subgraph Character Sum The source derives the formula governing low-degree detection of a planted subgraph, observes the character sum in it should be small for most graphs, and says it leaves the rigorous study of the question to future work. No bound is proved and none is stated as a target. 5 open |
Average Case HardnessPlanted Subgraph Problemslower-boundadaptation (ai) | |
|
Constant-round Luby–Rackoff, quantum Resolved for r=7. Carolan (Compressed Permutation Oracles, ePrint 2025/1734, STOC 2026) proves seven-round Luby-Rackoff with truly random round functions is indistinguishable from a random invertible permutation against Omega(N^{1/12}) bidirectional quantum queries (his Theorem 6.5), exactly this page’s conjecture with r=7 – and states, without full proof here, that the result lifts to pseudorandom round functions (the strong qPRP form) by a standard hybrid argument. The paper’s own abstract calls this ‘resolving an open question of (Zhandry, 2012).’ |
Feistel NetworksPseudorandom PermutationsQuantum Query Complexityotherequivalenceresearch-solved | |
|
Best-first search trees Open, with no bound of any kind proved for the best-first algorithm on any class of query distributions. Exact optimality is already refuted by the paper’s own exhaustive search, so only the approximation ratio remains, and a workload on which greedy is off by an unbounded factor would settle it. 5 open |
Search Treestight-bound | |
|
dv-SNARG, One Group Element Numbered Conjecture 1.3 of the source. Its own theorems achieve one group element plus O(tau) bits, and (with a random oracle) one group element, one hash output and about 2 tau bits; the conjecture halves the additive term to tau + o(tau) and asks for no random oracle. 4 open |
Generic Group ModelProof Size Lower BoundsSnarksggmcharacterization | |
|
Four-party NIKE, quadratic, Maurer’s model Open. Achieved in Shoup’s generic group model by the source paper (Construction 9, Theorem 10); in Maurer’s model the paper’s own O(n^2) attack sets a ceiling that a construction would meet exactly, and nothing is known about reaching it. 5 open |
Generic Group ModelNon Interactive Key Exchangeggmseparation | |
|
Perfectly Correct Statistical ARE Statistical security with statistical correctness is settled by the source for every finite function. Perfect correctness is known in the computational setting and, in the statistical setting, only in a relaxed Las Vegas form where the evaluator may declare failure. 4 open |
Additive Randomized EncodingsShuffle Modelcharacterizationadaptation (ai) | |
|
Quadratic attack on 3-NIKE, Shoup’s model Open in Shoup’s model. Settled by the source paper in Maurer’s model for every K at least 3, including imperfect correctness; its own three-party Shoup construction achieves only an n^1.5 gap, so the truth for three parties lies somewhere between n^1.5 and n^2. 5 open |
Generic Group ModelNon Interactive Key Exchangeggmlower-bound | |
|
Two-block sponge attack, quadratic advice Open: whether the multi-instance two-block sponge attack of advantage (S2T4/C2)S lifts to an auxiliary-input attack of advantage S2T4/C^2, matching the best proved security bound. Settled in the multi-instance model; no partial result in the auxiliary-input model. 7 open |
Collision FindingCollision Resistant HashingTime Space Tradeoffspromlower-boundadaptation (ai) | |
|
Sources vs Randomness Blowup Conjecture 13 of the source. Its companion question – how many parties must be able to toss coins – is settled exactly by the same paper: t sources for deterministic functionalities, t+1 for randomized ones, even though the adversary may corrupt all of them. What the count costs is not settled. Both halves of the Theta are open. 5 open |
Random SourcesRandomness Complexitytight-bound | |
|
Quantum two-block MD collisions Open, in both directions and with no partial result: whether the best known quantum preprocessing attack, of advantage ST^2/N + T^3/N, is optimal for two-block Merkle-Damgård collisions. The source reports that no matching quantum bounds are known at any block length. 7 open |
Collision FindingCollision Resistant HashingQuantum Query ComplexityQuantum Random Oracle ModelTime Space Tradeoffsqromtight-bound | |
|
AVPs Are Lengthy Posed as Hypothesis 1.2 and offered both as a working hypothesis and as an ambitious target. Theorem 1.3 proves it implies super-polynomial lower bounds on sd-PIR, general secret sharing and fully-decomposable randomized encodings – for none of which a super-linear lower bound is currently known. The source adapts counting-based arguments to the model but does not reach the best-known bound for any primitive. 4 open |
Garbled CircuitsPrivate Information RetrievalProof Size Lower BoundsRandomized Encodingslower-boundbarrier (ai) | |
|
Efficient Parity-Tolerance Simulation Feasibility is settled: every circuit can be compiled into a t-parity-tolerant one. What is open is the simulator’s running time, which in the source’s construction is exponential in t; the source gives partial evidence, under LPN, that inefficient simulation may be inherent for a related relaxed notion. 4 open |
Leakage Resilient CircuitsLearning Parity With Noisecharacterization | |
|
Optimal 2D LPHS Open, and asserted rather than asked: the source prints the algorithm, conjectures the error rate, reports experiments consistent with it, states it could not analyse it, and leaves settling it to future work. The matching lower bound is the source’s own theorem, so a proof would close the two-dimensional case exactly. 7 open |
Distributed Discrete LogarithmGeneric Group ModelLocality Preserving Hashingtight-boundadaptation (ai) | |
|
Optimal martingale gap finders Open for small mu. Settled when mu is bounded away from zero, where the Cleve-Impagliazzo gap finder already gives the conjectured product; for general mu the known bound is a factor mu short and the paper states it does not know the answer. 5 open |
Coin Tossinglower-bound | |
|
SZK Batch Verification Named by the source as the most pressing open question its work leaves. Its Theorem 1.1 gives the NISZK analogue: communication and CRS length poly(n, log k) for k up to 2(n0.01). A poly(n) dependence is unavoidable even at k = 1 under a sub-exponential hardness assumption, so log k is the aggressive part of the bound. The source also offers a weaker fallback target: any sub-linear dependence on k. 5 open |
Batch VerificationDirect Product TheoremsLimited IndependenceRandomness Extractioncharacterization | |
|
Fully quantum time-lock puzzles Open in the fully quantum case. Settled by the source paper when the generator is classical and the solver quantum, and when the generator is quantum and the solver classical under perfect completeness; a classical-query attack on the remaining cell would prove a simulation conjecture. 5 open |
Quantum Query ComplexityQuantum Random Oracle ModelTime Lock Puzzlesqromimpossibility | |
|
CSAT with Small Space and Preprocessing Conjecture 1.2 of the source, a parameterized family rather than a single claim. Corollary 1.3 turns each parameter setting into a limitation on succinct IOPs. The source attaches decreasing confidence as the class T grows, calling the largest setting only (arguably) unlikely to be false rather than confidently believed. 4 open |
Interactive Oracle ProofsProof Size Lower BoundsSpace Bounded ComputationTime Space Tradeoffslower-boundbarrier (ai) | |
|
CAQB key agreement, imperfect completeness Open. Settled for perfect completeness by the source paper’s Theorem 3.1; the argument’s final step uses perfect completeness in a way that no known weakening survives, and the paper’s Simulation-Conjecture barrier does not cover this party structure. 5 open |
Quantum Key AgreementQuantum Query ComplexityQuantum Random Oracle Modelqromimpossibility | |
|
One Haar State Looks Like Many Stated in the source’s Open Problems section as a conjecture it believes true, with the note that it could neither prove it nor find it proved or even formalised anywhere. The source proves a strictly weaker pointwise domination bound, its Lemma 2, sufficient for its own applications and silent about total variation distance. 5 open |
Pseudorandom Quantum StatesQuantum CryptographyQuantum Informationothertight-boundadaptation (ai) | |
|
Classical presampling, quantum queries Open, and provably hard to prove: the source’s Theorem 4 shows it implies a central open problem in quantum computing. No refutation has been attempted either, and the source takes no position on which way it goes – it states the conjecture in order to show that the classical technique cannot simply be transplanted. 6 open |
PresamplingQuantum Query ComplexityQuantum Random Oracle ModelRandom Oracle Modelqromlower-boundbarrier (ai) | |
|
Almost k-Wise Locality Gap Settled up to a log n factor at word size 1 and at word size Omega(log^2 n) and above; the source gives no matching construction at all for intermediate word sizes, so the gap is recorded only where both a bound and a construction exist to compare. 4 open |
Limited IndependenceLocally Computable Hashingtight-boundadaptation (ai) | |
|
SBP Collision Resistance Posed as a displayed Open Question and called a central open challenge. The source gives an efficient online collision finder for small kappa and an overlap-gap-based online lower bound for a different, randomized activation – introduced precisely because the SBP’s own collision space resists a first-moment analysis. For very large kappa collisions become trivial. The middle window is reached by neither technique. 4 open |
Average Case HardnessCollision Resistant HashingOverlap Gap PropertyPlanted Constraint Satisfactionseparation | |
|
Conflict Checkable Codes Beyond Half-Singleton Theorem 1.8 proves k <= (n-d+2)/2 for codes that are both comparison-based and local-to-global consistent. Theorem 1.3 gives an almost-MDS conflict checkable code at k >= n-d+1-epsilon which bypasses that bound, but it is neither comparison-based nor known to be local-to-global consistent. The conjecture names comparison-basedness as the culprit. It already holds at d = n-1. 4 open |
Code Based CryptographyLocally Testable CodesThreshold Secret Sharingseparationadaptation (ai) | |
|
Partial-PKI consensus up to one-half resilience Open: whether consensus is achievable at every resilience gamma < 1/2 in the paper’s permissionless common-random-string setting, by some protocol using any means of bootstrapping party identities. The source proves resilience up to 1/4(1-3*epsilon) via a specific protocol and proves 1/4 is tight only for the restricted class of protocols that sign everything they send and verify everything they receive; the gap to the classical 1/2 ceiling is open for arbitrary protocols. 5 open |
Byzantine Agreementtight-boundIOG | |
|
Constant-Overhead AMD Circuits Polylogarithmic overhead in |C| and lambda is achieved by Genkin, Ishai and Weiss; constant overhead is open. The source’s Theorem 43 shows that achieving it would – together with the source’s own constant-overhead OT protocol – settle the main open question on constant-overhead secure computation for general Boolean circuits. 4 open |
Fault Tolerant CircuitsOblivious Transfercharacterization | |
|
Split-source decomposition Open for a query budget of two or more: whether a random oracle decomposes into bit-fixing mixtures when the advice is produced by two sources that never communicate. Proved and tight at q = 0, and proved at q = 1 under an extra hypothesis. 4 open |
Multi Source ExtractorsRandom Oracle ModelRandomness Extractionromtight-bound | |
|
Degree-2 Statistical RE Question 1.6 of the harvested paper, attributed there to Ishai-Kushilevitz and Applebaum-Ishai-Kushilevitz and described as open for almost 20 years. Degree-3 statistical encodings exist for every finite function; negative results are known for perfectly private degree 2. The harvested paper adds a new consequence, its Proposition 1.7. 4 open |
Arithmetic CryptographyNon Interactive Secure ComputationRandomized Encodingscharacterizationbarrier (ai) | |
|
r-round DLOG tradeoff Open for every intermediate r: the r = 1 endpoint is the source’s own theorem and r = T is Corrigan-Gibbs–Kogan, with nothing proved in between. The source conjectures the interpolating formula and says a matching attack exists at every r, so the missing half is the lower bound. 6 open |
AdaptivityDiscrete LogarithmGeneric Group ModelTime Space Tradeoffsggmtight-bound | |
|
Distance from Lines Modulo a Prime Numbered Conjecture 5.37 of the source, described there as a natural but apparently new number-theoretic conjecture whose study may be of independent interest. Nothing is proved about it; the source notes a deterministic variant might be easier to prove and is still useful. 5 open |
Oblivious Linear EvaluationOblivious Transferlower-bound | |
|
Composability implies circular security Open with no partial result in either direction. The converse – circular security plus limited homomorphism gives full composability – is the source paper’s Theorem 6; this direction, which would make the two properties essentially equivalent, is conjectured there and nothing has been published towards it. 7 open |
Circular SecurityFully Homomorphic Encryptionequivalence | |
|
Seeded Extractors Are Multi-Instance Posed by the source with both answers live. It proves the property for two code-based extractors via a hinting property it isolates; concurrent independent work of Dinur, Stemmer, Woodruff and Zhou proves it for universal hash functions by a different argument. No extractor is known to fail it and no general proof is known. 4 open |
Incompressible EncryptionRandomness Extractioncharacterization | |
|
6-round Feistel indifferentiability Whether 6-round Feistel is fully indifferentiable from a random permutation is open, bridging the proven r=5 attack and the proven r>=8 construction. 2 open |
Feistel NetworksIndifferentiabilityPseudorandom Permutationsothertight-bound | |
|
Generalized mirror theory The fully generalized Mirror Theory bound for arbitrary cycle-consistent multi-graphs up to the information-theoretic limit is open; current techniques only reach component size O(N^{1/4}). 2 open |
Block CiphersMirror TheoryPseudorandom Permutationslower-bound | |
|
Double-sided zero search Resolved, unconditionally. Carolan (Compressed Permutation Oracles, ePrint 2025/1734, STOC 2026) proves this exact statement – his Problem 3, p. 72, naming it ‘the double-sided zero search problem, due to Unruh’ – as a corollary (Corollary 7.6) of a general predicate-search lower bound (Theorem 7.5) proved directly from his own compressed permutation oracle’s soundness (Theorem 5.19). Unlike Unruh’s own derivation, this proof does not route through Unruh’s CPO-soundness conjecture (c/0036) at all, so it holds regardless of that conjecture’s status. |
Compressed OracleQuantum Query Complexityotherlower-boundresearch-solved | |
|
DPP Field Size The small-field regime is settled: soundness Theta(1/sqrt q) is achieved and proved optimal. In the large-field regime the source achieves soundness eps for every prime p at least Omega~(S9/eps6) and states in as many words that it believes the S-dependence is not tight. 4 open |
Linear PcpsSnarkstight-boundadaptation (ai) | |
|
LHL extraction, public seed Proven, and the statement is now formalized in Lean with an AI match check: the public-seed bound holds with a concrete constant, but the proof itself is still only informal (PDF), unreviewed, and unformalized. 6 open |
Leftover Hash LemmaRandom Oracle ModelRandomness Extractionromtight-boundresearch-solvedadaptation (ai) | |
|
Level-optimal beyond disjunctions Open beyond disjunctive queries, and the authors state it as a conjecture without naming the broader class – identifying one is part of the problem. Proved for every distribution supported on disjunctions, where the log n factor is also shown necessary. Wide open for conjunctive queries, where the paper’s proof technique demonstrably fails. 5 open |
Search Treestight-bound | |
|
RBE needs Ω(log n) updates Refuted. Mahmoody and Qi, Online Mergers and Applications to Registration-Based Encryption and Accumulators (ITC 2023), construct an RBE scheme with O(log n / log log n) decryption updates and poly(kappa, log n) public parameters – strictly below the Omega(log n) this statement conjectured – via a fully online merger structure, matching the known lower bound exactly. The paper states this explicitly resolves the open question. 4 open |
Registration Based Encryptionlower-boundresearch-solvedadaptation (ai) | |
|
EA-Code Distance over Rings Theorem 3.10 of the source proves the distance bound over F_2 only. Over a ring of size q its proof technique forces the rate to satisfy R much less than 1/ln q, which the source states it believes is an artefact of the argument, supported by small-parameter weight-distribution experiments over F_17 and Z_16. 5 open |
Code Based CryptographyDual DistanceLearning Parity With NoisePseudorandom Correlation Functionslower-boundadaptation (ai) | |
|
SK-DEPIR from One-Way Functions Stated by the source as its own conjecture and proved for two-round passive-server schemes. Its main theorem – that any crypto oracle can be stripped out of a SK-DEPIR and replaced by a one-way function – is stated conditionally on this, so the conjecture is the single remaining hypothesis between that compiler and a clean statement that no idealized generic primitive helps. 4 open |
Black Box SeparationsOne Way FunctionsPrivate Information Retrievalimpossibility | |
|
No key agreement from GC-OWF Open for round complexity growing with the security parameter. Proved in full for two messages, which is public-key encryption; the constant-round extension is sketched in the paper’s appendix without a theorem, its security half deferred to the PKE proof. 5 open |
Black Box SeparationsGarbled CircuitsKey Agreementotherseparationadaptation (ai) | |
|
No Self-Reduction for LSN Conjecture 5.20 of the source. It proves no random self-reduction exists from an arbitrary worst-case QNCP instance into LSN, naming exchange symmetry between code and error as the obstruction, and proves the tableau-randomizing barrier conditionally on the scrambling gap being polynomially related to eps. It is explicit that this is not an impossibility for random self-reductions in general. 4 open |
Average Case HardnessLearning Parity With NoiseQuantum InformationStabilizer Codesimpossibilityadaptation (ai) | |
|
No 2-element split NILPs A submitted construction gives a two-element split NILP for Boolean circuit satisfiability in the plain generic Type-III bilinear-group model; proof review and formalization remain open. 2 open |
Generic Group ModelProof Size Lower BoundsSnarksimpossibilityresearch-solved | |
|
iO Overhead, Single-Output The first of the source’s named main open problems. Its main theorem gives an Omega(s/log s) additive overhead lower bound for iO on multi-output circuits under NP not in BPP – an assumption that is minimal, since a zero-overhead scheme exists if NP is in BPP. The single-output case is not covered, and the source says why: its route runs through NP-hardness of Multi-MCSP. 4 open |
Black Box SeparationsMinimum Circuit Size ProblemOne Way Functionslower-boundbarrier (ai) | |
|
OWFs are black-box useless for key agreement Open in the general case, which the paper names as the central open problem left by its work. Settled for three restricted protocol classes: constant-query perfect, constant-round constant-query imperfect, and Merkle-type. 5 open |
Black Box SeparationsKey AgreementOne Way Functionsotherimpossibility | |
|
OWFs are black-box helpful for CRHFs Open in both directions. Two relaxations — distributional and class-reduction helpfulness — are proved conditional on the Simon-oracle amplification conjecture; neither yields the universal auxiliary primitive the full statement needs. 4 open |
Black Box SeparationsCollision Resistant HashingOne Way Functionsotherseparation | |
|
Arithmetic Two-Server PIR Optimality O(n^{1/3}) is achieved by arithmetizing the classical two-server schemes. The source states that whether it can be improved – let alone brought to sub-polynomial – is unknown, and supplies a linear-algebraic characterization of exactly what an improvement would require. 5 open |
Arithmetic CryptographyPrivate Information Retrievaltight-bound | |
|
Perfect FASS at 3-out-of-5 Statistical and computational FASS are settled by the source and prior work. The perfect version is stated by the source to be open for every reconstruction threshold 3 <= t <= n-2, and open even for the weaker multi-dealer notion, with 3-out-of-5 the smallest open case. Con has settled the perfect case for gap threshold structures. 5 open |
AnonymityThreshold Secret Sharingcharacterizationadaptation (ai) | |
|
Polylog Shuffle PIR, Negligible Error Settled in three neighbouring corners: O(n^gamma) communication with inverse-polynomial error and polynomially many queries; polylogarithmic communication with n^{O(log n)} queries; and negligible error with O(n/log n) communication. The polylogarithmic-and-negligible corner with polynomially many queries is open, and is ruled out for inner-outer constructions with an additive inner layer by the source’s own Theorem 6.5. 5 open |
Private Information RetrievalShuffle Modelcharacterizationadaptation (ai) | |
|
OWF minimality, non-black-box reductions Open when the classical security implication is not witnessed by a black-box reduction between the two games. Settled affirmatively whenever it is, for uniform and non-uniform quantum adversaries alike, with the implementation reduction left arbitrary. 5 open |
Black Box SeparationsOne Way FunctionsQuantum Cryptographyequivalence | |
|
Simon-oracle amplification, strong version Open. The version without the collision finder is known only when the one-way function is itself a random oracle; with an arbitrary one-way function, with or without the collision finder, nothing is established. 5 open |
Black Box SeparationsCollision Resistant HashingOne Way Functionsotherlower-bound | |
|
RS Proximity Gaps to Capacity Proved up to the Johnson/Guruswami-Sudan bound delta < 1 - sqrt(rho); conjectured up to capacity delta <= 1 - rho - eta. The source records that nothing known contradicts c1 = c2 = 2, and that in characteristic greater than the degree nothing known contradicts c1 = c2 = 1 – while those smaller exponents are provably ruled out in characteristic two. 5 open |
Proximity TestingReed Solomon CodesSnarkstight-boundbarrier (ai) | |
|
Quasi-Abelian GV, Growing Group Named as a conjecture by the source, which says the development is out of reach of the article. It is what makes the choice of group free in the QA-SD line: resistance to every linear test, for any abelian G, reduces to it. Partially advanced in 2026 by concrete non-asymptotic bounds for particular groups, which restate the general question as open. 5 open |
Code Based CryptographyDual DistancePseudorandom Correlation FunctionsSyndrome Decodinglower-boundadaptation (ai) | |
|
Ring-LWE error parity Open: whether recovering the Ring-LWE error modulo two is as hard as recovering the error itself. The easy direction is trivial; the source states it has no formal reduction for this one and relies on two heuristics instead, one of which changes the error distribution. 6 open |
Learning With Errorsequivalence | |
|
RM Gap to Capacity for BEC Conjecture 14 of the source. That Reed-Muller codes achieve capacity for the BEC is a theorem of Kudekar et al.; the gap to capacity – a polynomial rate of convergence – is open. The source needs it to strengthen its refutation of the expansion-implies-hardness conjecture for noisy k-XOR from quasi-polynomially many constraints to polynomially many, and notes the question was raised explicitly in three prior works. 4 open |
Average Case HardnessCode Based CryptographyExpander GraphsReed Solomon Codestight-bound | |
|
No round-optimal pairing-free blind signature Open for a polynomial query budget. The impossibility is proved when User_2 and Verify together make O(log lambda) random-oracle queries, including when oracle outputs contain group elements; the superpolynomial message space hypothesis is retained. 5 open |
Black Box SeparationsBlind SignaturesGeneric Group ModelSignature Schemesggmimpossibilityadaptation (ai) | |
|
RBR Soundness Amplification Known in the special case of r-round protocols whose standard and round-by-round soundness errors are maximally separated, eps_RBR about eps^{1/r}; open in general, including the eps^{2/r} regime the source’s own protocol occupies. 4 open |
Fiat ShamirParallel Repetitionlower-bound | |
|
Computationally unique VDFs in the ROM Resolved. Guan, Riazanov and Yuan, Breaking Verifiable Delay Functions in the Random Oracle Model (ePrint 2024/766, CRYPTO 2025), prove that no VDF in the parallel ROM can have completeness and computational uniqueness and be sigma-sequential for sigma a fixed polynomial in the security parameter and the Setup/Verify query counts – their Theorem 5.1, which in fact covers general (not just perfect) completeness error, strictly more than this conjecture asked for. The proof is human-authored and published; it has not yet been independently re-derived by this site or formalized in Lean. 3 open |
Black Box SeparationsRandom Oracle ModelVerifiable Delay Functionsromimpossibilityresearch-solved | |
|
Salt Length vs. Call Count Fully open in both directions: no construction with \(O(\lambda)\)-length, message-independent salts and \(O(1)\) Merkle-Damgård calls is known, and no proof that none can exist, nor any trade-off between the two, has been given either. 4 open |
IndifferentiabilityRandom Oracle Modelromcharacterization | |
|
Short-Salt MD Combiner Security Open in both directions: the source’s Theorem 3.1 proves security only when salts exceed the message by at least the security parameter, and reports neither an attack nor a security proof once the salts shrink to a constant number of blocks. 4 open |
IndifferentiabilityRandom Oracle Modelromcharacterizationadaptation (ai) | |
|
3-way collision, oblivious sequential curve Open: closing the factor-root-S gap between the proved oblivious lower bound and a matching table-and-hunt algorithm for finding a 3-way collision with an oblivious sequential branching program. 2 open |
Collision FindingRandom Oracle ModelTime Space Tradeoffsromtight-boundadaptation (ai) | |
|
Compressed permutation oracle soundness Still open as formalized, but the underlying research question – can the compressed-oracle technique be extended to permutations at all – is now resolved in the affirmative by a different construction. Carolan (Compressed Permutation Oracles, ePrint 2025/1734, STOC 2026) proves his own compressed permutation oracle unconditionally sound. That oracle is, in his own words, ‘similar to that of Unruh [Unr23], though we explicitly and unitarily maintain injectivity of the database’ – a change that goes beyond resolving Unruh’s own left-open choice of how the flipping operator acts on non-injective inputs. Whether Unruh’s original construction (for an arbitrary such choice) is itself sound remains, on the reading defended here, unestablished. |
Compressed OraclePseudorandom PermutationsQuantum Query Complexityotherequivalence | |
|
Hold-Out Soundness, Dirty Coordinates The source’s distinguishing attack is unconditional and proved. Its decryption attack is heuristic, and this is the unproved step: completeness on clean coordinates is its Claim 6.2, while soundness on dirty ones is supported only by a heuristic dimension count and small-parameter experiments. 5 open |
Code Based CryptographyPrivate Information Retrievalcharacterization | |
|
Statistical Robust ARE The source asks whether all functions admit a statistically secure ARE, robust or non-robust, and strongly conjectures the answer is negative. The non-robust half was refuted: Bitansky, Erabelli, Garg and Ishai construct statistical AREs for all finite functions. The robust half is open, and is re-posed by that later work. 4 open |
Additive Randomized EncodingsRandomized Encodingscharacterization | |
|
Censoring can only hurt Open. The censored side is proved at essentially optimal round count with matching lower bounds; what is missing is the transfer of any such bound to uncensored AES at the same round count. 5 open |
Block CiphersPseudorandom Permutationslower-bound | |
|
Randomness Complexity of XOR The source proves an Omega(t^2) lower bound, matching Kushilevitz and Mansour’s non-explicit O(t^2 log(n/t)) upper bound up to a logarithmic factor, and up to a constant factor when t = Omega(n). It also gives an explicit protocol at O(t^2 log^2 n). It states it leaves the remaining polylogarithmic gaps open. 4 open |
Limited IndependenceRandomness Complexitytight-bound | |
|
MDSD Linear-Test Bias The source proves a non-tight reduction from standard decisional syndrome decoding and separately conjectures that the DOOM algorithm is the best attack; the linear-test bias is the one quantity it states it cannot bound. 5 open |
Learning Parity With NoiseShuffle ModelSyndrome Decodinglower-bound | |
|
CHV Online Threshold Conjecture 1 of the source, its online threshold conjecture. The source gives an online algorithm achieving kappa = O(sqrt(alpha)/B) and an overlap-gap argument against stable algorithms; the conjecture pins the constant sqrt(pi/8) as the exact place where online algorithms stop. Separately it proves, under worst-case lattice hardness, that no polynomial-time algorithm solves CHV for kappa = O(1/(B n^(1/2+eps))). 4 open |
Average Case HardnessCollision Resistant HashingLocality Preserving HashingOverlap Gap Propertytight-bound | |
|
Non-adaptive DDH bound Open, and asserted rather than asked: the source proves 1/2 + O~(T^2/N + sqrt(ST/N)), states twice that it conjectures this is not tight for DDH, and names 1/2 + O~(T^2/N + ST/N) as the right answer. The same theorem’s square-DDH bound is sharp, with a matching attack, which is what makes the DDH case a question rather than a suspicion. 6 open |
AdaptivityDiscrete LogarithmGeneric Group ModelTime Space Tradeoffsggmtight-boundadaptation (ai) | |
|
STB conjecture (Merkle-Damgård) Open for non-constant B in the regime ST^2 > 2^n, where the best published security bound and the best published attack are a factor of up to S apart; settled at B=1, B=2, every constant B, B~T, and every 2<B<T with ST^2 <= 2^n. 6 open |
Collision FindingCollision Resistant HashingRandom Oracle ModelTime Space Tradeoffsromtight-boundbarrier (ai) | |
|
STB conjecture (sponge) Open for every B >= 2 except B ~ T: at B=2 in the regime ST^3 > C, and at B >= 3 with a gap of about T/B. The source asks for a proof or a refutation and takes no position. 7 open |
Collision FindingCollision Resistant HashingTime Space Tradeoffspromtight-boundbarrier (ai) | |
|
Tight \(k\)-collision time-space tradeoff The exact tight time-space tradeoff for k>=3 collisions under preprocessing is open; only the k=2 case has a matching upper and lower bound. 2 open |
Collision FindingRandom Oracle ModelTime Space Tradeoffsromtight-bound | |
|
RBE update bound, key-dependent schedules Resolved. Wei Qi, Tight Lower Bound on Witness Update Frequency in Additive Positive Accumulators (IACR Communications in Cryptology, 2026), generalizes the Mahmoody-Qi-Rahimi lower-bound framework to schedules that may depend on the sampled public keys themselves, via a new combinatorial structure (the falling-step sequence), and proves the same asymptotic bound holds. The paper states this explicitly resolves the open problem left in the source paper. 5 open |
Registration Based Encryptionlower-boundresearch-solvedadaptation (ai) | |
|
WP Threshold Share Size The 2-out-of-n case is settled: Beimel and Franklin give 1/n-weakly-private schemes with share size 2, against Theta(log n) for perfect privacy. The source states large thresholds are open and asks specifically about (n-1)-out-of-n at share size o(log n). 5 open |
Threshold Secret Sharingcharacterizationadaptation (ai) | |
|
AES t-Wise Independence, t > 2 Named by the source as the first of the two outstanding open problems that come of its work. It proves almost pairwise independence (t = 2) for multi-round AES with independent round keys, and an existential t-wise result for key-alternating ciphers with most permutations, but nothing for concrete AES beyond t = 2. Its Appendix B attacks 4-wise independence in the width-1 case with the same S-box. 4 open |
Block CiphersLimited IndependencePseudorandom PermutationsT Wise Independencecharacterizationbarrier (ai) |
No matching items