Lower Bound
| Status | Statement | Tags |
|---|---|---|
|
Planted-Subgraph Character Sum The source derives the formula governing low-degree detection of a planted subgraph, observes the character sum in it should be small for most graphs, and says it leaves the rigorous study of the question to future work. No bound is proved and none is stated as a target. 5 open |
Average Case HardnessPlanted Subgraph Problemslower-boundadaptation (ai) | |
|
Quadratic attack on 3-NIKE, Shoup’s model Open in Shoup’s model. Settled by the source paper in Maurer’s model for every K at least 3, including imperfect correctness; its own three-party Shoup construction achieves only an n^1.5 gap, so the truth for three parties lies somewhere between n^1.5 and n^2. 5 open |
Generic Group ModelNon Interactive Key Exchangeggmlower-bound | |
|
Two-block sponge attack, quadratic advice Open: whether the multi-instance two-block sponge attack of advantage (S2T4/C2)S lifts to an auxiliary-input attack of advantage S2T4/C^2, matching the best proved security bound. Settled in the multi-instance model; no partial result in the auxiliary-input model. 7 open |
Collision FindingCollision Resistant HashingTime Space Tradeoffspromlower-boundadaptation (ai) | |
|
AVPs Are Lengthy Posed as Hypothesis 1.2 and offered both as a working hypothesis and as an ambitious target. Theorem 1.3 proves it implies super-polynomial lower bounds on sd-PIR, general secret sharing and fully-decomposable randomized encodings – for none of which a super-linear lower bound is currently known. The source adapts counting-based arguments to the model but does not reach the best-known bound for any primitive. 4 open |
Garbled CircuitsPrivate Information RetrievalProof Size Lower BoundsRandomized Encodingslower-boundbarrier (ai) | |
|
Optimal martingale gap finders Open for small mu. Settled when mu is bounded away from zero, where the Cleve-Impagliazzo gap finder already gives the conjectured product; for general mu the known bound is a factor mu short and the paper states it does not know the answer. 5 open |
Coin Tossinglower-bound | |
|
CSAT with Small Space and Preprocessing Conjecture 1.2 of the source, a parameterized family rather than a single claim. Corollary 1.3 turns each parameter setting into a limitation on succinct IOPs. The source attaches decreasing confidence as the class T grows, calling the largest setting only (arguably) unlikely to be false rather than confidently believed. 4 open |
Interactive Oracle ProofsProof Size Lower BoundsSpace Bounded ComputationTime Space Tradeoffslower-boundbarrier (ai) | |
|
Classical presampling, quantum queries Open, and provably hard to prove: the source’s Theorem 4 shows it implies a central open problem in quantum computing. No refutation has been attempted either, and the source takes no position on which way it goes – it states the conjecture in order to show that the classical technique cannot simply be transplanted. 6 open |
PresamplingQuantum Query ComplexityQuantum Random Oracle ModelRandom Oracle Modelqromlower-boundbarrier (ai) | |
|
Distance from Lines Modulo a Prime Numbered Conjecture 5.37 of the source, described there as a natural but apparently new number-theoretic conjecture whose study may be of independent interest. Nothing is proved about it; the source notes a deterministic variant might be easier to prove and is still useful. 5 open |
Oblivious Linear EvaluationOblivious Transferlower-bound | |
|
Generalized mirror theory The fully generalized Mirror Theory bound for arbitrary cycle-consistent multi-graphs up to the information-theoretic limit is open; current techniques only reach component size O(N^{1/4}). 2 open |
Block CiphersMirror TheoryPseudorandom Permutationslower-bound | |
|
Double-sided zero search Resolved, unconditionally. Carolan (Compressed Permutation Oracles, ePrint 2025/1734, STOC 2026) proves this exact statement – his Problem 3, p. 72, naming it ‘the double-sided zero search problem, due to Unruh’ – as a corollary (Corollary 7.6) of a general predicate-search lower bound (Theorem 7.5) proved directly from his own compressed permutation oracle’s soundness (Theorem 5.19). Unlike Unruh’s own derivation, this proof does not route through Unruh’s CPO-soundness conjecture (c/0036) at all, so it holds regardless of that conjecture’s status. |
Compressed OracleQuantum Query Complexityotherlower-boundresearch-solved | |
|
RBE needs Ω(log n) updates Refuted. Mahmoody and Qi, Online Mergers and Applications to Registration-Based Encryption and Accumulators (ITC 2023), construct an RBE scheme with O(log n / log log n) decryption updates and poly(kappa, log n) public parameters – strictly below the Omega(log n) this statement conjectured – via a fully online merger structure, matching the known lower bound exactly. The paper states this explicitly resolves the open question. 4 open |
Registration Based Encryptionlower-boundresearch-solvedadaptation (ai) | |
|
EA-Code Distance over Rings Theorem 3.10 of the source proves the distance bound over F_2 only. Over a ring of size q its proof technique forces the rate to satisfy R much less than 1/ln q, which the source states it believes is an artefact of the argument, supported by small-parameter weight-distribution experiments over F_17 and Z_16. 5 open |
Code Based CryptographyDual DistanceLearning Parity With NoisePseudorandom Correlation Functionslower-boundadaptation (ai) | |
|
iO Overhead, Single-Output The first of the source’s named main open problems. Its main theorem gives an Omega(s/log s) additive overhead lower bound for iO on multi-output circuits under NP not in BPP – an assumption that is minimal, since a zero-overhead scheme exists if NP is in BPP. The single-output case is not covered, and the source says why: its route runs through NP-hardness of Multi-MCSP. 4 open |
Black Box SeparationsMinimum Circuit Size ProblemOne Way Functionslower-boundbarrier (ai) | |
|
Simon-oracle amplification, strong version Open. The version without the collision finder is known only when the one-way function is itself a random oracle; with an arbitrary one-way function, with or without the collision finder, nothing is established. 5 open |
Black Box SeparationsCollision Resistant HashingOne Way Functionsotherlower-bound | |
|
Quasi-Abelian GV, Growing Group Named as a conjecture by the source, which says the development is out of reach of the article. It is what makes the choice of group free in the QA-SD line: resistance to every linear test, for any abelian G, reduces to it. Partially advanced in 2026 by concrete non-asymptotic bounds for particular groups, which restate the general question as open. 5 open |
Code Based CryptographyDual DistancePseudorandom Correlation FunctionsSyndrome Decodinglower-boundadaptation (ai) | |
|
RBR Soundness Amplification Known in the special case of r-round protocols whose standard and round-by-round soundness errors are maximally separated, eps_RBR about eps^{1/r}; open in general, including the eps^{2/r} regime the source’s own protocol occupies. 4 open |
Fiat ShamirParallel Repetitionlower-bound | |
|
Binary dual-distance bound is the worst case Open, and asserted rather than asked – the source writes that it expects the inequality, gives an intuition covering one of the two competing effects, records that all prior work assumes it, and proves nothing. A probe at small parameters is consistent with it; the parameters the source’s own construction uses are out of computational reach, which is why the source does not check it either. 7 open |
Average Case HardnessDual DistanceLearning Parity With Noiselower-boundadaptation (ai) | |
|
Censoring can only hurt Open. The censored side is proved at essentially optimal round count with matching lower bounds; what is missing is the transfer of any such bound to uncensored AES at the same round count. 5 open |
Block CiphersPseudorandom Permutationslower-bound | |
|
MDSD Linear-Test Bias The source proves a non-tight reduction from standard decisional syndrome decoding and separately conjectures that the DOOM algorithm is the best attack; the linear-test bias is the one quantity it states it cannot bound. 5 open |
Learning Parity With NoiseShuffle ModelSyndrome Decodinglower-bound | |
|
RBE update bound, key-dependent schedules Resolved. Wei Qi, Tight Lower Bound on Witness Update Frequency in Additive Positive Accumulators (IACR Communications in Cryptology, 2026), generalizes the Mahmoody-Qi-Rahimi lower-bound framework to schedules that may depend on the sampled public keys themselves, via a new combinatorial structure (the falling-step sequence), and proves the same asymptotic bound holds. The paper states this explicitly resolves the open problem left in the source paper. 5 open |
Registration Based Encryptionlower-boundresearch-solvedadaptation (ai) |
No matching items