Tight Bound
| Status | Statement | Tags |
|---|---|---|
|
192-Round AES Pairwise Independence Theorem 7 proves the bound for 192-round censored AES – real AES S-boxes and mixing layer, but a subset of the mixing layers removed. The source conjectures the same round count suffices for AES itself, and calls proving it an outstanding open problem. The best proved bound for actual AES is Liu, Tessaro and Vaikuntanathan’s, which needs more than 9000 rounds. 4 open |
Block CiphersLimited IndependencePseudorandom PermutationsT Wise Independencetight-bound | |
|
Balanced Root-n Preprocessing PIR The client-space-times-bandwidth product is settled up to n^{o(1)} by the source’s own matching bounds. What is open is whether client space, bandwidth and per-query server computation can all sit at O~(n^{1/2}) simultaneously; the best known point has client space and server computation O~(n^{2/3}). 4 open |
Private Information RetrievalTime Space Tradeoffstight-bound | |
|
Best-first search trees Open, with no bound of any kind proved for the best-first algorithm on any class of query distributions. Exact optimality is already refuted by the paper’s own exhaustive search, so only the approximation ratio remains, and a workload on which greedy is off by an unbounded factor would settle it. 5 open |
Search Treestight-bound | |
|
Sources vs Randomness Blowup Conjecture 13 of the source. Its companion question – how many parties must be able to toss coins – is settled exactly by the same paper: t sources for deterministic functionalities, t+1 for randomized ones, even though the adversary may corrupt all of them. What the count costs is not settled. Both halves of the Theta are open. 5 open |
Random SourcesRandomness Complexitytight-bound | |
|
Quantum two-block MD collisions Open, in both directions and with no partial result: whether the best known quantum preprocessing attack, of advantage ST^2/N + T^3/N, is optimal for two-block Merkle-Damgård collisions. The source reports that no matching quantum bounds are known at any block length. 7 open |
Collision FindingCollision Resistant HashingQuantum Query ComplexityQuantum Random Oracle ModelTime Space Tradeoffsqromtight-bound | |
|
Optimal 2D LPHS Open, and asserted rather than asked: the source prints the algorithm, conjectures the error rate, reports experiments consistent with it, states it could not analyse it, and leaves settling it to future work. The matching lower bound is the source’s own theorem, so a proof would close the two-dimensional case exactly. 7 open |
Distributed Discrete LogarithmGeneric Group ModelLocality Preserving Hashingtight-boundadaptation (ai) | |
|
Sub-log Share Size for 2-out-of-n The information-theoretic share size is exactly log n and Shamir’s scheme matches it. The source proves a (1/5) log log n lower bound for the computational setting with public information, leaving a log n versus log log n gap, and proves that beating log n by any constant factor is equivalent to a concrete planted clique-and-independent-set problem. 4 open |
Average Case HardnessPlanted Subgraph ProblemsThreshold Secret Sharingtight-bound | |
|
One Haar State Looks Like Many Stated in the source’s Open Problems section as a conjecture it believes true, with the note that it could neither prove it nor find it proved or even formalised anywhere. The source proves a strictly weaker pointwise domination bound, its Lemma 2, sufficient for its own applications and silent about total variation distance. 5 open |
Pseudorandom Quantum StatesQuantum CryptographyQuantum Informationothertight-boundadaptation (ai) | |
|
Almost k-Wise Locality Gap Settled up to a log n factor at word size 1 and at word size Omega(log^2 n) and above; the source gives no matching construction at all for intermediate word sizes, so the gap is recorded only where both a bound and a construction exist to compare. 4 open |
Limited IndependenceLocally Computable Hashingtight-boundadaptation (ai) | |
|
Partial-PKI consensus up to one-half resilience Open: whether consensus is achievable at every resilience gamma < 1/2 in the paper’s permissionless common-random-string setting, by some protocol using any means of bootstrapping party identities. The source proves resilience up to 1/4(1-3*epsilon) via a specific protocol and proves 1/4 is tight only for the restricted class of protocols that sign everything they send and verify everything they receive; the gap to the classical 1/2 ceiling is open for arbitrary protocols. 5 open |
Byzantine Agreementtight-boundIOG | |
|
Split-source decomposition Open for a query budget of two or more: whether a random oracle decomposes into bit-fixing mixtures when the advice is produced by two sources that never communicate. Proved and tight at q = 0, and proved at q = 1 under an extra hypothesis. 4 open |
Multi Source ExtractorsRandom Oracle ModelRandomness Extractionromtight-bound | |
|
r-round DLOG tradeoff Open for every intermediate r: the r = 1 endpoint is the source’s own theorem and r = T is Corrigan-Gibbs–Kogan, with nothing proved in between. The source conjectures the interpolating formula and says a matching attack exists at every r, so the missing half is the lower bound. 6 open |
AdaptivityDiscrete LogarithmGeneric Group ModelTime Space Tradeoffsggmtight-bound | |
|
6-round Feistel indifferentiability Whether 6-round Feistel is fully indifferentiable from a random permutation is open, bridging the proven r=5 attack and the proven r>=8 construction. 2 open |
Feistel NetworksIndifferentiabilityPseudorandom Permutationsothertight-bound | |
|
DPP Field Size The small-field regime is settled: soundness Theta(1/sqrt q) is achieved and proved optimal. In the large-field regime the source achieves soundness eps for every prime p at least Omega~(S9/eps6) and states in as many words that it believes the S-dependence is not tight. 4 open |
Linear PcpsSnarkstight-boundadaptation (ai) | |
|
LHL extraction, public seed Proven, and the statement is now formalized in Lean with an AI match check: the public-seed bound holds with a concrete constant, but the proof itself is still only informal (PDF), unreviewed, and unformalized. 6 open |
Leftover Hash LemmaRandom Oracle ModelRandomness Extractionromtight-boundresearch-solvedadaptation (ai) | |
|
Level-optimal beyond disjunctions Open beyond disjunctive queries, and the authors state it as a conjecture without naming the broader class – identifying one is part of the problem. Proved for every distribution supported on disjunctions, where the log n factor is also shown necessary. Wide open for conjunctive queries, where the paper’s proof technique demonstrably fails. 5 open |
Search Treestight-bound | |
|
Arithmetic Two-Server PIR Optimality O(n^{1/3}) is achieved by arithmetizing the classical two-server schemes. The source states that whether it can be improved – let alone brought to sub-polynomial – is unknown, and supplies a linear-algebraic characterization of exactly what an improvement would require. 5 open |
Arithmetic CryptographyPrivate Information Retrievaltight-bound | |
|
RS Proximity Gaps to Capacity Proved up to the Johnson/Guruswami-Sudan bound delta < 1 - sqrt(rho); conjectured up to capacity delta <= 1 - rho - eta. The source records that nothing known contradicts c1 = c2 = 2, and that in characteristic greater than the degree nothing known contradicts c1 = c2 = 1 – while those smaller exponents are provably ruled out in characteristic two. 5 open |
Proximity TestingReed Solomon CodesSnarkstight-boundbarrier (ai) | |
|
RM Gap to Capacity for BEC Conjecture 14 of the source. That Reed-Muller codes achieve capacity for the BEC is a theorem of Kudekar et al.; the gap to capacity – a polynomial rate of convergence – is open. The source needs it to strengthen its refutation of the expansion-implies-hardness conjecture for noisy k-XOR from quasi-polynomially many constraints to polynomially many, and notes the question was raised explicitly in three prior works. 4 open |
Average Case HardnessCode Based CryptographyExpander GraphsReed Solomon Codestight-bound | |
|
3-way collision, oblivious sequential curve Open: closing the factor-root-S gap between the proved oblivious lower bound and a matching table-and-hunt algorithm for finding a 3-way collision with an oblivious sequential branching program. 2 open |
Collision FindingRandom Oracle ModelTime Space Tradeoffsromtight-boundadaptation (ai) | |
|
Randomness Complexity of XOR The source proves an Omega(t^2) lower bound, matching Kushilevitz and Mansour’s non-explicit O(t^2 log(n/t)) upper bound up to a logarithmic factor, and up to a constant factor when t = Omega(n). It also gives an explicit protocol at O(t^2 log^2 n). It states it leaves the remaining polylogarithmic gaps open. 4 open |
Limited IndependenceRandomness Complexitytight-bound | |
|
CHV Online Threshold Conjecture 1 of the source, its online threshold conjecture. The source gives an online algorithm achieving kappa = O(sqrt(alpha)/B) and an overlap-gap argument against stable algorithms; the conjecture pins the constant sqrt(pi/8) as the exact place where online algorithms stop. Separately it proves, under worst-case lattice hardness, that no polynomial-time algorithm solves CHV for kappa = O(1/(B n^(1/2+eps))). 4 open |
Average Case HardnessCollision Resistant HashingLocality Preserving HashingOverlap Gap Propertytight-bound | |
|
Non-adaptive DDH bound Open, and asserted rather than asked: the source proves 1/2 + O~(T^2/N + sqrt(ST/N)), states twice that it conjectures this is not tight for DDH, and names 1/2 + O~(T^2/N + ST/N) as the right answer. The same theorem’s square-DDH bound is sharp, with a matching attack, which is what makes the DDH case a question rather than a suspicion. 6 open |
AdaptivityDiscrete LogarithmGeneric Group ModelTime Space Tradeoffsggmtight-boundadaptation (ai) | |
|
STB conjecture (Merkle-Damgård) Open for non-constant B in the regime ST^2 > 2^n, where the best published security bound and the best published attack are a factor of up to S apart; settled at B=1, B=2, every constant B, B~T, and every 2<B<T with ST^2 <= 2^n. 6 open |
Collision FindingCollision Resistant HashingRandom Oracle ModelTime Space Tradeoffsromtight-boundbarrier (ai) | |
|
STB conjecture (sponge) Open for every B >= 2 except B ~ T: at B=2 in the regime ST^3 > C, and at B >= 3 with a gap of about T/B. The source asks for a proof or a refutation and takes no position. 7 open |
Collision FindingCollision Resistant HashingTime Space Tradeoffspromtight-boundbarrier (ai) | |
|
Single-session lattice Chevallier-Mames tightness Open: whether the one-session lattice translation of the Chevallier-Mames signature has a tight SUF-CMA reduction to search Module-LWE, or whether the paper’s two-fold parallel repetition (which doubles signature size and signing time) is inherent to a tight proof of this shape. 4 open |
Learning With ErrorsSignature SchemesTight Reductionsromtight-bound | |
|
Tight \(k\)-collision time-space tradeoff The exact tight time-space tradeoff for k>=3 collisions under preprocessing is open; only the k=2 case has a matching upper and lower bound. 2 open |
Collision FindingRandom Oracle ModelTime Space Tradeoffsromtight-bound |
No matching items